Robotics: Reference Shelf, Volume 82, Number 1

   
 
 
 

Preface

In his 1942 short story “Runaround,” the legendary science fiction writer Isaac Asimov outlines his famous “three laws of robotics,” a set of principles that governed much of his subsequent work and influenced generations of fiction writers, scientists, engineers, and philosophers. According to Asimov, a robot “may not injure a human being,” “must obey any orders given to it by human beings,” and “must protect its own existence, as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.” Asimov sometimes broke these rules, but even so, they speak to a certain idealized notion of robots, suggesting that intelligent, self-aware machines might simultaneously serve and live in harmony with their human creators.

While such optimistic views have proven popular—The Jetsons, Short Circuit, and Wall-E are three of the many movies and television shows that have featured lovable, benevolent robot characters—they’re not the only ones that have taken root in the public’s consciousness. From 1921’s RUR (Rossum’s Universal Robots)—the Czech play that introduced the term “robot”—to the more recent “Terminator” films and TV series, people have long considered the dangers of “playing god” and creating artificial life. Just as Adam and Eve refused to follow the rules of their creator, robots featured in sci-fi tales often rebel against humans, using superior strength and intellect to take over the world.

One decade into the 21st century, neither vision has come to pass. While the world is home to millions of robots—defined by the Carnegie Science Center as any machine that “gathers information about its environment (senses) and uses that information (thinks) to follow instructions to do work (acts)”—few bear any resemblance to the walking, talking humanoids so prevalent in popular culture. Most are decidedly less glamorous: assembly-line arms, Roomba vacuums, pill-sorting and supply-schlepping hospital helpers, and military “drone” flyers. To be sure, these and other real-life robots represent stunning technological breakthroughs, but none are advanced enough to pass for human.

Nevertheless, this issue of The Reference Shelf arrives at a pivotal time, as scientists edge ever closer to fulfilling the fantasies of sci-fi enthusiasts and creating robots that—thanks to either expert programming or the development of genuine “artificial intelligence” (AI)—have the power to operate autonomously and interact with people. This volume aims to present a brief history of robotics, examine how far the field has progressed, and look to the future, considering both the promises and perils of building increasingly complex robots.

The first chapter, “Of Men and Machines: Robotics—Past, Present, and Future,” contains articles that place today’s robots in historical context. The pieces also consider how different cultures view these technological marvels, contrasting the attitudes of the Japanese—who, according to the author of one entry, have largely embraced them—with people from other nations, who have expressed more trepidation, fearing that, among their other downsides, mechanized workers are rendering human ones obsolete.
Selections in the second chapter, “Faster, Stronger, Cheaper: Robotic Automation in the Workplace,” take a closer look at what effects robots have had on a variety of industries. Some experts contend that robots stand to increase productivity without costing people jobs, while others say “othersourcing”—the practice of replacing humans with machines—is a serious problem that will only get worse. The next chapter, “The Robot Will See You Now: Robotics in Health Care,” features selections that center on how machines are helping doctors and health-care professionals better serve patients. As if the da Vinci Surgical System, a device that allows surgeons to operate via remote control and make remarkably small incisions, weren’t amazing enough, scientists have now set their sights on building microbots and nanobots—machines tiny enough to swim through patients’ bodies and fight disease from the inside.

Moving from the inner workings of the human body to the furthest regions of outer space, pieces in the fourth chapter, “Robots in Space,” detail efforts to explore the cosmos using unmanned spacecraft. Already, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunity are bolstering scientists’ knowledge of the Red Planet, and in the coming decades, robots might be used to build lunar space stations and relay information from beyond our solar system.

NASA isn’t the only government agency with an interest in robots. “Lifesavers or Killing Machines? The Pros and Cons of Robots in the Military,” the next chapter, comprises articles that look at how machines are replacing men on the battlefield. The selections pay particular attention to the moral questions associated with using robots as weapons. Entries in the final chapter, “Thinking, Feeling Robots: The Dream (or Nightmare) of Artificial Intelligence,” explore the feasibility and philosophical implications of building truly human-like robots. While some doubt software or circuitry will ever give robots brains that rival man’s, others believe the line between human and machine is destined to be erased.

Robots may eventually take over, but they haven’t yet, and I’m happy to report that this book was made with the help of real, live humans. I’d like to express my sincerest gratitude to all of the writers who allowed their work to be reprinted herein, as well as to my colleagues Paul McCaffrey and Richard Stein, editors whose wit and intellect scientists would be hard-pressed to duplicate. I would also like to thank my parents, Deb and Ken Sr., and my new wife, Lindsey. Don’t worry, guys: Should the robots attack, I’ll be ready!

Kenneth Partridge
February 2010

Robotics